The rise of Animaker

A workshop is taking form, soon to be born of the ideas and support from an ambassador and the entire staff of a polytechnic institute.

Following the excited consent of the Director of the Student Innovation iLab, the developing station of all things visual and lively is nearing its next milestone – receiving a place in the iLab website’s list of eventbrite dates.

It was set up by the spontaneous inspiration of a specific software – cue a shout-out to Pencil 2D – and the Maker Studio Operator’s eager suggestion to name the eventbrite-based activity Animaker.

More is to come; look for the videos of the Instructor’s gallery.

View original post

Third Initiation in the Mix

3-D printing. For those who are new to the concept, it’s a layered method of creating objects. Think models of geographic landscapes constructed by multiple layers, each layer being an overwhelmingly slight transition in the story of how a physical object took form. The only catch in this perspective is that an approach regarding the idea of layering focuses on building objects from the foundation up. Nonetheless, an approach has been taken toward it – one of the most innovative advances in present years.

Although 3-D printing pens will be the starting attempt, it is an introductory part of the path to becoming a well-experienced 3-D equipment operator.

Popularizing this technology might just be yet another large means of manifesting imagination into matter; that is, with a limit that has been extended – pushed beyond the era during which seemingly science-fiction-related things were insisted to be inconceivable and almost “sinfully ridiculous”.

Thou are invited to share the spoils and the fruition of creativity among yourselves.

More is to come, with a new level of sincerity.

Paradox Thinking | Defense with Nihilism

The following article was posted on the website Paradox Thinking some days, maybe weeks ago. As this website is loosely with Paradox Thinking, here is presented yet another post that was originated from Paradox Thinking. Three times’ a charm, some people say. Is it? Another question would be to decide on the importance or trivial state of whether to even fuss over the maxim about triples.

The concept of moral and the standards of moral are often meant/intended for life on Earth.

However, morality is limited to life on Earth; it doesn’t go beyond life on Earth or surrounding Earth. Coexisting with life on Earth has its unspoken and unnoticed consequences. Life exclusively on earth or not exclusively on Earth are both equally spooky, subjectively speaking for many people.

Among the best measures of defensive thinking is the observation that a person would do something supposedly on the condition that doing such a thing would be good. However, a vital part of this written observation is that the nature of “good” would need to be specified and explained, depending on the circumstances of interest. It’s vital, because some living things such as people can experience the feeling of subjective sensations that they label with the linguistic terms “comfort”, “pain”, “right”, “wrong”, “positive”, “negative”, “stoic”, and “emotion”. People who abide by the ways of society and think that they are justified in abiding its ways are favored by society.

People who do not abide by the ways of society and think that they are justified in not abiding by its ways are not favored by society. The result, subjectively speaking, could be a worsened reputation, exclusion from society, being found dangerous by society, and more.

But first, which reality are you in?

Paradox Thinking | The cracks in the management of marketing

The moral paradox of giving people a product that satisfies their need or demand for whatever it is and the product giver’s internal interest in the circumstance that the person to whom they give a product does not stay satisfied after firsthand consumption of the product.

This paradox is born of the mind of Adam Smith’s improvisation of the invisible hand that puts action to the situation regarding a course of events in present time, whenever that time is.

Virus of the Mind: Irony

Since when did the word “right” have a bad connotation?

Since when did the word “left” have a relatively positive connotation?

These are semi-rhetorical questions.

The word “right” now hints toward the existence of prigs.

The word “left” now hints toward people who think they can identify themselves as rebels with various causes.

But the individual assumes that everyone knows well enough, so the individual says and does nothing.

The populace says and does nothing, because it knows nothing about itself.

Paradox Thinking | Skipped a Step

Before learning about the ethics of something, consider and ponder ethics itself. Investigate ethics existentially. Different standards of what should be done at whatever time and in whatever way are often around in modern days. There are practical things to do, but doing such things corresponds with the idea of doing those things under the influence of a “better or best interest”. For example, it is often said that it is in people’s best interest to conform with the entire group and commit to whatever is perceived as favorable – the goal, perhaps. Well, in this society, that would be the least of group and individual expectations.

But, following a previous post on Paradox Thinking titled Plato: Meno, there are things to rethink. One prominent issue is the fact that Plato kept looking for things that a group various individuals things have in common. Here, he may have used the concept of majorities. However, in the film The Great Debaters, people are reminded that there can be circumstances under which majority rule comes in effect while not always being correct. The term “correct” relies on a standard of acceptance to be defined. Here, based on the premise that such ideas are known to be the work of humans, whatever is accepted and understood to be a part of the human mind is a factor of influence in creating a standard.

This post began with the word “ethics” in the first sentence. Like many words, the concept of the word “morality” has an ancestry. It originally took the conceptual form of whatever was in the criteria that made organisms eligible for some extended duration in the struggle for existence.

A little bit rusty, but there’s more to come.

GHWB

Empathy is facing disappearance. The meme culture of carefree self expression is taking a path toward magnifying the negative aspects of people. Instead of administering first principles thinking, people are associating him with a legacy of conspiracies and mistakes, true, false, or not yet verified. While these people certainly can focus on the good actions that others present toward society, the reality of this phenomenon is something that apparently only seems to happen with an entity with cosmological compassion whose name His own self-declared believers subconsciously misuse.

Become Your Why.

Do not be pursuing passion. It means that you could be in for a trap.

Society derives and extracts from you. No matter how negative the connotation, society might as well need to exploit you for its own needs by the millions of people out there.

Many philosophers and religious leaders have consulted their own minds regarding passion or purpose. They figure that ego is a focus on oneself for one’s self interest which doesn’t play well into community life.

Stating “I want happiness” only gets the Buddha to remove “I”, ego and “want”, desire from that statement. The end result is form of joy that is quite foreign to many people, since they just don’t know of that path either very well or at all.

Society is heavily repulsed form people who just want things; they are cynical of corporations and other excessively large companies, basically.

Humans do not deserve a lot. They are going far astray from their own purpose. In fact, their own purpose was corrupted in ancient times by a virus that made them cognitively able for millennia to come.

The large factory in Bowing only resembled ego. It did imply service for others, but it had to occupy the would-be homes of entire neighborhoods.

Airbnb is taking up neighborhoods.

Other companies are corrupting society in an effort to derive and contribute to it.

Illogical. Even impractical in terms of byproducts.

However, some people are not legalistic.

Thus, they would not even bother to read this section of this article.

But finding you inner truth ironically involves what you can do for others, not what others can do for you.

Life is a violent twist in viewpoints, perspectives, outlook, and understanding. A baby seeks only for itself, yet it grows and ages only find that society does no translate well into its own roots’ needs.

From personal experience, there have been findings that are shared views by fellow people on the same journey. A few people administering classes do not teach but are paid. They do not educate, they spray history. We actually educate them. We take things out of them – knowledge in particular.

That is essentially the root meaning of education.

Love makes anything irrational. God would have logically eradicated humanity, but he apparently loves humanity too much to get rid of it.

How is this faith based situation possible?

That was a probably a trick question. It’s actually money that keeps them strong in legalism or else most religious bodies would be flicked out by the state sovereignty.

A rise in power comes from within us all.