Empathy is facing disappearance. The meme culture of carefree self expression is taking a path toward magnifying the negative aspects of people. Instead of administering first principles thinking, people are associating him with a legacy of conspiracies and mistakes, true, false, or not yet verified. While these people certainly can focus on the good actions that others present toward society, the reality of this phenomenon is something that apparently only seems to happen with an entity with cosmological compassion whose name His own self-declared believers subconsciously misuse.
Do not be pursuing passion. It means that you could be in for a trap.
Society derives and extracts from you. No matter how negative the connotation, society might as well need to exploit you for its own needs by the millions of people out there.
Many philosophers and religious leaders have consulted their own minds regarding passion or purpose. They figure that ego is a focus on oneself for one’s self interest which doesn’t play well into community life.
Stating “I want happiness” only gets the Buddha to remove “I”, ego and “want”, desire from that statement. The end result is form of joy that is quite foreign to many people, since they just don’t know of that path either very well or at all.
Society is heavily repulsed form people who just want things; they are cynical of corporations and other excessively large companies, basically.
Humans do not deserve a lot. They are going far astray from their own purpose. In fact, their own purpose was corrupted in ancient times by a virus that made them cognitively able for millennia to come.
The large factory in Bowing only resembled ego. It did imply service for others, but it had to occupy the would-be homes of entire neighborhoods.
Airbnb is taking up neighborhoods.
Other companies are corrupting society in an effort to derive and contribute to it.
Illogical. Even impractical in terms of byproducts.
However, some people are not legalistic.
Thus, they would not even bother to read this section of this article.
But finding you inner truth ironically involves what you can do for others, not what others can do for you.
Life is a violent twist in viewpoints, perspectives, outlook, and understanding. A baby seeks only for itself, yet it grows and ages only find that society does no translate well into its own roots’ needs.
From personal experience, there have been findings that are shared views by fellow people on the same journey. A few people administering classes do not teach but are paid. They do not educate, they spray history. We actually educate them. We take things out of them – knowledge in particular.
That is essentially the root meaning of education.
Love makes anything irrational. God would have logically eradicated humanity, but he apparently loves humanity too much to get rid of it.
How is this faith based situation possible?
That was a probably a trick question. It’s actually money that keeps them strong in legalism or else most religious bodies would be flicked out by the state sovereignty.
A rise in power comes from within us all.
There are certain roles that one must take.
Two of them are conflicting; they are the backbone of an abstract dilemma that lies embedded in reality.
They are the role-dependent and the role-independent.
Role-dependent is where a person commits actions or a plan of action based on the interest of others/the situation/the environment/the surroundings/society/law.
Role-independent is where a person commits actions or a plan of action based on personal choice or interests.
There are burdens that must be negotiated in dictation of nature withheld by a black and white fallacy.
Among them are empathy, sympathy, the favor of satisfaction, and frugality concerning/regarding/with a focus on/in the interest of the extent of a certain possibly conditional investment.
The favor of satisfaction is defined as the perceived goal that a lifeform should pursue to achieve in the prehistorically exclusive case that doing so would benefit/support/provide some advantage to the prospects of the lifeform’s chance/condition of survival.
The state of being conditional is defined as the chance/probability/certainty that choosing/acting against what should happen to benefit the historically managed achievement would antagonize/cause disadvantage to one’s best paths to follow – looking into the interests that should be regarded in the future that which steadily approaches the present. The rate of approach is independent of one’s perception of the rate’s identified self.
The extent of investment is defined as to have put in so much effort only to perchance face the rigid confrontation to end/prevent it in the form of a separate body of actions not under governing by the investor of some apparent rank in society.
The lexicography has yet to be competed.
9/22/2018 shi er dian san shi jiu AM
A friend of mine wrote this work. In support of celebration and tolerance of various lifestyles for often exploratory reasons, content from my friend’s website holisticunderstanding.wordpress.com is presented here.
(Created my free logo at LogoMakr.com)
I know what your thinking! “Charles Rastafari is not a religion there is no transition!”
My friend your are 99.999% wrong, living the Rasta life is definitely a transition. Now, you are definitely right Rastafari is NOT a religion; it is a life style. But the morals and the way you carry your self is a world within itself. Once I decided that I was going to dedicate time to this new lifestyle, quickly the realization hit of how hard it actually is. Once you are “awake” to the problems of the world it is very hard to go back. Babylon aka America is a very dangerous place for a young black male such as myself. The way I talk has changed the most, no I don’t mean by talking with an accent. But, I now take time to really think before I…
View original post 266 more words
When a person finally enters to system of society, suddenly everything around the person seems as if it is merely computer-generated content while the only true being is the person himself/herself.
Nobody seems to care, nobody seems to smile, nobody seems to show any signs of public liveliness.
It is truly as if you are suddenly the only human on Earth.
Some have a personal question: “What is good?”
There are things that people say in these times.
“God is good.”
“God is good?”
“Is God good?”
But a number of us have often forgotten to consider the identity of “good”.
Is it a term, a aspect of moral, something about morale, an involvement with ethics, a measurement unit of popularity?
The instincts of an organism, at least carbon-based, set the organism in the behavioral manner and thought procession of measuring the attractiveness of something according to the benefits of applying the thing in consideration to its prospects of survival.
Independent minds are brought into the world of allegedly interconnected mostly thought-originated communications. However, humanity has found various problems, hindrances, and difficulties in the process of doing virtually anything. For example, one may have anything not limited to hallucinations, mirages, and mismatched senses. Some may smell scents when touching surfaces. Some may see colors when hearing sounds.
Under these conditions, one may not fully acknowledge the presence or existence of anything they believe to be interacting with. Because of this labyrinth of supposedly uneasily suspected and probable illusions, Rene Descartes concluded that he could only prove himself to be a being in the midst of all that has yet to be confirmed.
In arguments, opponents may not realize the things that they haven’t considered in their proposition during a debate; they might have forgotten to use or recognize their own faults or fallacies when they try to state their position on something of a matter.
One of Plato’s works, a dialogue between a character known as Meno and Plato, Plato begins by using the generic whole of a population of generally anything and asks Meno if there is anything that gradually progresses to some sort of conclusion regarding the allegedly existential identity of virtue. The progress approaches a seemingly ongoing path of ideas and thoughts that are considered, registered, processed, filtered, sifted, proven, and/or disproven. Not limited to beginning with the question of whether virtue can be taught, or the assertions/assumptions of what good might be in the eyes of a poet, Meno triggers strenuous explosions of detailed logic from one question’s applications and constraints, and strives for the possible relief of satisfying implosions of aggressively detailed logic nearly into the form one-unit mathematical equations. Finally, Meno uses references of what has become arbitrary or stereotypically expected of men, women, children, and the poor. In the past, it was widely accepted as correct and justified for men to work and run the government, while the women would do housework, prepare and serve food and drinks, and the children held in obedience to regulate the factor of supposedly existent chaos.
They reach disputable points where they seem to blindly suggest that rulers and/or dictatorships could be the ultimate solution, although the mood between them seems to be anticlimactic immediately after a possible subclimax/miniature turning point.
There is probably at least one place, a clearing in the Hundred Acre Wood, where readers can counter both speakers’ platforms of experimentally established beliefs. One may notice that Plato has been consistently using numerous analogies of various collectively categorized objects that each broadly variate in the subtleness of their differences from each other.
However, the whole or the majority is not always right, correct, or justified (mind the fallacies that wholes and majorities that each may not suspect or notice but have). Take natural selection for instance. At times, a few groups or individuals have undergone certain mutations that allow them to better survive in nature by serving as either exclusive or nonexclusive adaptation. The majority or majorities are vanished, but the minority persist and/or prevail. There is another counterargument that be merely simplified into one word: Extinctions. The faulty action(s) of one population/collective group can instantaneously endanger and/or virtually delete itself from a chance a survival in their wake or lack of registering of the resources around them that might benefit their . . . . self-interest-guided idea of what is good.
In the movie, “The Great Debaters”, the debaters of Wiley College were attempting to counter the debaters of Harvard University in their beliefs regarding civil disobedience in a time of rabid discrimination. One of the Wiley College debaters angrily mentioned the negative aspects of majorities in terms of humanity in its pettily ego-fueled self-search for the conclusive state of absentminded discrimination following its identity as a source-turned side-effect of war (Wars adding to the triangular colonial trade and then the Civil War in America).
People might desire to keep something “pleasantly” in accordance with their religious views, while explaining everything in the matter with the simple “just-world hypothesis” and assumption/usurpation of entitlement (almost as if to lose as clearly as one could lose, yet call/shout to the heavens an apparent triumph and victory). But their actions force their beliefs to become their religion without any regard for history.
Just like institutionalized education, which somehow happened to manage well (branding educational sources – the baneful aspects/effects/face/side of economically utilizing competition) in making pupils strain great heaps of effort that can only afford them to pass a class/course subject, Knowledge became abstract biochemical software coding that comes hastily without any regard for history.
And if one tries to ask to confirm any regard for history, the answer comes with angry thoughts and possible misunderstandings that one might be insulting the knowledge and reputability/reliability of the person who being asked.
7:20 Returning an item to faculty.
7:21 Names on mailbox . . . please exist, I know you exist, but I can’t find you . . . please exist.
7:22: On the left is “H” all capitalized, the engraved official nickname is “Aquaman”, all capitalized. Okay, interesting and amusing. (That must have been Mr. Sanchez or somebody)
Below – at the bottom is “K” all capitalized, I forgot what the nickname was. It was also engraved as an official label, but it definitely did not say “Buzz Lightyear” or “Woody” all capitalized. It should have said “Vader” or something all capitalized. But superheroes were of regard, not unrelated villains.
7:23 Several yards away, I hear, “We need to secede from . . . “. I already know I am blurting in my head the phrase “the union”, but I heard otherwise.
Currently, I am thinking “exactly what is going on”?!
Will there be a civil dispute? More importantly, can I bring cake, ice cream, and popcorn while I sit on the benches to watch?
*Mouth full of imaginary treats and somewhat muffled* So who’s winning the battle? Kratos or Zeus? Hmm?
Stalemate? *Takes another bite* Oh, okay, then! Anyone have tea? Green tea. What? No, not coffee. I said tea, green tea. Soda is fine too. Or fruit punch. Just water? Fair enough.
Look! Look! Nothing is happening yet.
People say the word “like” often. It is either spoken impulsively, or to implicitly hint a rhetorical degree of uncertainty. Now, people say the word in such a way as though it is now colloquially an arbitrary requirement in the grammatical region of the English language. It is used to either mean or not intentionally mean definite certainty of something’s nature or abstract characteristic that which is being associated to it as the object.
No. It is not normal. It was based on something else. On a far-fetched scope, some parents do not tell the child what the answer to something is. Having full faith in the child’s knowledge, they adamantly assume that everything wrong answer that their child submits is actually their refusal to think and their impulse to submit unmatched results. The child is thus temporarily intimidated for his or her life, as the parents begin to yell, scold, and physically strike him or her under the stubborn and misunderstanding-based mistaken belief that the child must be physically shaken to submissively reveal the correct or desired answer.
Ultimately, the child becomes oblivious to this after worrying and overthinking to the point where all thoughts and emotions collectively develop an emerging singularity in that the child suddenly forgets what is the objective, the task, and the gravity of the situation. Later, during a generic conversation, the child begins to use elongated tones to end their declarative sentences as protection from potentially uprising parental or peer anger and exasperation from allegedly believing that they have already informed the child of the key items of regard.
The elongated tone of the declarative sentences is a descendant of the wave-variating elongated tone first used a verbal question, the tones held higher, then lower, then higher again, on repeat.
Ultimately, the child grows up and old while in an eternal state of uncertainty and faded fear and worry that becomes numb over time. This is why we profusely use the words “like” and “as”. In fear of this article being seen as an apparently unprofessional work, many linguists, psychologists, and anthropologists will refuse to respect this work, nonverbally suggesting that its possible prominence could bring down their reputability and usher in an unwanted new age where they could lose their economic strength and endurance in the world of grisly, greasy, and gruesome infrastructure.
The perception-based rate at which events arrive to the interface of consciousness.
How many times have I redefined time? I do know that this is a different definition and the latest determined evidence and experience-based result.
Let’s see if I might redefine time yet again later . . . until further notice.